Skip to main content
The Devastating Impact of Defective Tires
Imagine cruising down the highway, the sun glinting off your windshield. You feel a sense of calm control, confident in your vehicle and your ability to navigate the road. Suddenly, a violent jolt rips through your car. You lose steering, swerve into traffic, and a crash follows. In the aftermath, you are left with serious injuries, mounting medical bills, and unanswered questions about why your tire failed.
Defective tires are not random accidents. They are the result of preventable design flaws, poor manufacturing practices, or a lack of proper warnings. When they fail, the results are catastrophic. SUVs and trucks, with their higher center of gravity, are particularly prone to rollovers caused by tire failures, and rollover accidents carry a fatality rate of nearly 50 percent.
The Engineering of a Catastrophe: Why You Need a Defective Tire Lawyer
What is a Blowout?
A blowout is the sudden loss of air pressure caused by a rupture in the tire’s structure. At highway speeds, this can result in total loss of control. Multi-vehicle pileups, rollovers, and lane departures are common outcomes.
Anatomy of a Tire
To understand how these failures occur, it helps to know the major parts of a tire:
- Bead: Anchors the tire to the wheel rim. A weak bead can cause sudden detachment.
- Sidewall: Absorbs lateral forces. Sidewall cracks or bulges weaken stability.
- Tread: Provides traction and resists wear. Poor bonding can cause it to peel away.
- Steel Belts: Strengthen the tread area. Misalignment can cause uneven stress points.
- Inner Liner: The airtight “tube” that holds pressure. A bad splice or overlap can cause leaks and sudden failures.
When any one of these components is compromised, the consequences can be deadly.
Identifying Manufacturing Defects
Defective tire cases often come down to identifying hidden errors in production. Common examples include:
- Tread Separation: Often linked to poor adhesion during vulcanization, causing the tread to detach from the belt package.
- Belt Misalignment: Off-center steel belts weaken the tire, causing cracks to propagate under load.
- Porosity and Contamination: Foreign objects like wood chips, fabric, or even air bubbles embedded in the rubber weaken structural integrity.
- Inner Liner Failures: Faulty construction of the liner causes leaks, leading to loss of air pressure.
A qualified defective tire lawyer works with engineers to uncover these issues, often using microscopic analysis, X-ray inspection, and materials testing.
Design vs. Manufacturing Flaws: The Legal Distinction
Not all tire defects are created equal. In litigation, the distinction between design defects and manufacturing defects is crucial:
- Design Defects: The tire model itself is inherently unsafe, meaning every tire in that product line poses a risk. These claims involve showing that a safer, feasible alternative design was available but not used.
- Manufacturing Defects: A specific tire or batch deviated from the intended design, creating an isolated but dangerous product.
Courts require precise engineering evidence to establish these distinctions. An experienced attorney ensures the right experts are retained to meet these legal burdens.
The Manufacturer’s Legal Duty
Tire manufacturers are required to follow Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). They must also self-certify that their products meet minimum safety benchmarks before entering the market.
Two common failures are:
- Poor Quality Control: Skipping testing or using outdated equipment leads to defective batches slipping through.
- Failure to Warn: Tires must include markings for load ratings, maximum inflation, and manufacture dates. Without these, consumers cannot make informed choices.
Failure to meet these obligations may create liability under Florida product liability law.
Proving Your Claim: The Forensic Investigation
A defective tire lawsuit depends on preserving and analyzing the evidence.
- Evidence Collection and Spoliation: The failed tire, vehicle, and even the accident scene must be preserved. Courts recognize “spoliation” as the destruction or loss of critical evidence, which can severely harm a case.
- Expert Analysis: Engineers specializing in tires study the failed product to identify rupture patterns such as zipper failures, bead separations, or delamination. Accident reconstructionists also determine how the failure caused the crash.
The sooner a lawyer is retained, the stronger the chain of custody and technical analysis.
Who Can Be Held Liable?
Responsibility for a defective tire accident may extend beyond the manufacturer:
- Tire Manufacturer: Usually the primary defendant in a product liability claim.
- Retailer or Distributor: Liable for knowingly selling recalled or improperly stored tires.
- Vehicle Manufacturer: At fault if a tire mismatch contributed to rollover risks.
- Mechanics or Installers: Responsible if negligent installation or repairs contributed to the failure.
An experienced attorney evaluates every potential defendant to maximize recovery for the victim.
Common Defenses from Tire Companies
Defendants rarely admit fault. Expect the following arguments:
- User Error: The tire was underinflated, overloaded, or not properly maintained.
- Road Hazard Damage: A pothole or sharp object, not a defect, caused the failure.
- Improper Repair: A prior patch or plug weakened the structure.
Your attorney’s job is to disprove these defenses through expert testimony and forensic analysis.
Damages in a Defective Tire Lawsuit
Victims of tire failures often face life-changing injuries such as spinal cord damage, traumatic brain injuries, and amputations. Compensation may include:
- Economic Damages: Past and future medical costs, lost wages, and rehabilitation expenses.
- Non-Economic Damages: Pain and suffering, emotional trauma, and reduced quality of life.
- Punitive Damages: Available in cases where the manufacturer acted with gross negligence or willful disregard for safety, such as knowingly selling defective tires or hiding recall information.
Why Legal Expertise Matters in Defective Tire Cases
Defective tire litigation is not like an ordinary auto accident claim. It requires:
- Technical Knowledge: Lawyers must understand tire engineering and failure modes.
- Access to Experts: Engineers, metallurgists, and reconstructionists are critical to proving causation.
- Multi-Defendant Litigation: Claims may span manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.
- Experience in Court: Tire manufacturers often refuse early settlements, making courtroom trial skills essential.
Why Choose Clark Fountain
At Clark, Fountain, Littky-Rubin & Whitman, we bring decades of trial experience and a national reputation for results. We have represented clients in more than 28 states in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases. Our record-setting verdicts in product liability cases prove we have the resources and determination to take on global corporations.
- Decades of Experience: Over 200 years of combined legal experience in complex litigation.
- Expert Network: We collaborate with leading forensic engineers, accident reconstructionists, and safety specialists.
- Contingency Fee Representation: You pay nothing unless we secure a recovery.
- Nationwide Reach: We co-counsel with firms across the United States to protect consumers everywhere.
Contact a Defective Tire Lawyer Today
If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident involving a defective tire, act quickly. Preserve the tire, secure the vehicle, and contact a lawyer before evidence disappears.
Call Clark, Fountain, Littky-Rubin & Whitman today for a free consultation. Our firm stands ready to hold manufacturers accountable and fight for the justice and compensation you deserve.
FAQs
Defective Tire and Vehicle Maintenance
- What is the tire’s full DOT number?
The Department of Transportation (DOT) number stamped into the sidewall is a fingerprint for every tire. It identifies the plant of manufacture, tire size, and batch. Attorneys use the DOT number to research recall history, identify whether other failures have occurred from the same batch, and subpoena production records if litigation is filed. - What is the tire’s date of manufacture?
The last four digits of the DOT number reveal the week and year of manufacture (for example, “2418” means the 24th week of 2018). Tires degrade chemically over time. Even if a tire looks brand new, oxidation and heat exposure weaken internal bonds. Most safety experts recommend replacing tires after 6–10 years. If a tire is older than that, it may be deemed unreasonably dangerous. - What is the tire’s TPC (Tire Performance Criteria) number?
Vehicle manufacturers like General Motors assign a TPC number to ensure a particular tire matches the handling, braking, and rollover resistance of a given vehicle. If a tire without the correct TPC code is sold or installed, the vehicle may be inherently unstable. This mismatch can form the basis of a product liability claim. - How old is the vehicle?
Older vehicles often have different load and inflation requirements. Using outdated or non-approved tires can increase rollover risks and complicate liability. Attorneys look closely at whether a tire matched the specifications set at the time of manufacture. - Was the vehicle’s Tire and Loading Information Placard consulted?
This placard, usually on the driver’s door jamb, lists the recommended tire size, inflation pressure, and load capacity. If a shop installed the wrong tire size or ignored the placard, liability may extend to the installer as well as the manufacturer. - Was the tire under a current or past recall?
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) maintains a searchable recall database. Using the DOT number, an attorney can quickly determine whether the tire was subject to a recall that should have been honored or disclosed. Failing to act on a recall can demonstrate negligence.
Analysis of the Tire Failure
- Is the failure a blowout or a tread separation?
A blowout is a sudden rupture, often explosive. A tread separation is more gradual, involving the tread peeling away from the belts. Distinguishing between the two is essential, as tread separations are strongly linked to defective bonding processes. - Did the failure involve a zipper rupture?
Zipper ruptures appear as small tears along the sidewall. They almost always indicate prolonged underinflation. Manufacturers often argue “user error,” but an expert can sometimes show the root cause was a defect that worsened under heat and pressure. - Are there signs of run-flat damage?
Driving on an underinflated tire creates internal scarring on the liner and sidewalls. Manufacturers may argue that run-flat damage proves driver negligence. Forensic engineers can often differentiate between run-flat scarring and true defects. - Is there evidence of bead failure?
The bead anchors the tire to the rim. Failures here can occur during inflation, mounting, or normal driving. If the bead itself was poorly manufactured, the failure may be attributable to a defect rather than user error. - Did the tire fail during inflation?
If a bead failure occurs at low pressure and injures the person inflating the tire, it is often a strong indicator of manufacturing error. Attorneys use OSHA standards and industry manuals to prove liability. - Are there foreign objects or contaminants inside the rubber?
During production, wood chips, fabric fibers, or trapped air pockets can become embedded in the tire. These contaminants act as weak points where cracks form and spread, ultimately leading to catastrophic failure. - Is the tread worn unevenly?
Uneven wear patterns reveal whether the tire was improperly designed, poorly manufactured, or simply neglected. Center wear may indicate overinflation, while shoulder wear points to underinflation. A skilled lawyer uses this evidence to either support or counter a manufacturer’s defense. - Are there bulges, blisters, or knots?
These visible deformities almost always indicate internal belt separation or trapped air in the manufacturing process. Bulges are strong evidence of defective production. - Are there signs of prior repair?
Improper repairs, such as plug-only fixes, can compromise structural integrity. A manufacturer will often point to these as the sole cause. A lawyer must evaluate whether the improper repair was a contributing factor or if the defect existed beforehand.
Post-Accident Investigation and Evidence
- Was the failed tire preserved?
The tire is the single most important piece of evidence. Once discarded or altered, proving a defect becomes nearly impossible. Attorneys immediately issue preservation letters to prevent spoliation. - Were photographs taken after the incident?
Accident scene photos capture the tire’s condition, vehicle position, and environmental factors. They help experts reconstruct the sequence of events and rule out competing explanations. - Was the pressure of the other tires checked?
The inflation level of the remaining tires offers insight into maintenance habits. If all other tires were properly inflated, claims of chronic underinflation may be weaker. - What do the vehicle’s maintenance records show?
Regular service records documenting rotations, alignments, and inspections can help prove the driver acted responsibly. These records are vital in defeating the “user error” defense. - Was the wheel or rim damaged?
If the rim shows no impact damage, it suggests the tire failed on its own. Rim dents, however, may indicate road hazard involvement. - Was a forensic expert consulted?
Tire engineers use destructive and non-destructive methods, including X-rays, scanning electron microscopes, and sectioning, to pinpoint defects. Their testimony is critical in court.
Human and Environmental Factors
- What was the vehicle’s speed at the time of failure?
High speeds create more heat and stress, increasing the likelihood of catastrophic failure. Speed analysis is crucial in accident reconstruction. - What was the ambient temperature?
Heat is one of the leading contributors to tire failures. In states like Florida, where road surfaces routinely exceed 120°F, temperature-related degradation is a major factor. - Was the vehicle overloaded?
Exceeding the maximum load rating weakens tires. Attorneys review placards, receipts, and cargo logs to determine whether the load was within limits. - Were there any road hazards?
Potholes, nails, or debris can mimic defect failures. Expert analysis is necessary to determine whether the damage came from an external hazard or an internal defect.
Tire and Vehicle Maintenance
- What was the inflation pressure at the time of failure?
Low tire pressure is the number one cause of blowouts. However, if the tire lost pressure due to a defect, the blame shifts back to the manufacturer. - What is the tire rotation history?
Failure to rotate tires can mask early warning signs of defective wear. Maintenance records become key evidence. - Was there recent tire service?
Improper mounting, balancing, or installation can cause bead failures or air leaks. Liability may extend to the installer. - What is the suspension and alignment history?
Misaligned suspension accelerates uneven wear, creating false signs of negligence. A forensic team must rule this out. - What is the history of tire repairs?
Only a plug-and-patch combination is considered a safe repair. Plug-only fixes can create dangerous weak spots. - Was a used tire installed?
Used tires often have hidden histories of impact or prior repair. If a shop sold a dangerous used tire without disclosure, it may share liability. - Was the tire exposed to chemicals or fluids?
Oil, grease, and cleaning solvents degrade rubber compounds, causing premature cracking. This evidence can shift liability to negligent maintenance facilities. - Was the vehicle recently involved in an impact?
Even a low-speed curb strike can damage internal belts, creating delayed failures. Accident reconstruction can uncover whether prior impacts were relevant.
Injured? Our Borders Don’t Stop in Florida
Start Your Consultation Today
Injured?
Consult an Expert Today
Donald R. Fountain, Jr.
Partner
Ben J. Whitman
Partner
Jason Cornell
Attorney
Shane T. Kirk
Attorney
James “Pete” Love
Florida Registered Paralegal Investigator
Lani Weir
Florida Registered Paralegal Investigator
Corinne Bustani
Paralegal Investigator
achieves results in
high-stakes circumstances
time and time again.
Call
561-899-2100
